Home

Free VIN Decoder

Decode Any Car VIN Here

Free Decoder by Decode This!

Syndicate

Clicky Web Analytics Car Sites - Top Automotive Web Sites
Image
Should We BAN Gas Guzzling Classic Cars?
Written by Administrator   
Everyone knows the pain at the pump today.  The average price of gasoline is exceeding $4 a gallon with no relief in sight.  Many people are investigating the best way to conserve fuel in order to maximize their money and to preserve the fuel supply.

Whenever the subject of gas shortages comes about the topic always changes to the biggest consumers and some say wasters of precious fuels, SUVs and old cars.  They're easy targets and can be singled out for their indulgent use of gas in these hard times.  Some say they're the cause of the current fuel shortage and look for a way to minimize their impact.

SUVs are still favored by a large percentage of the population, which then turns the focus on classic cars and their large carburetor-driven engines.  Gas guzzlers even back in their haydays of the 1960s and 70s these cars inefficiently burn gas at a rate that is unthinkable today.

Modern cars have a variety of systems in place to maximize their fuel efficiency.  First of all the carburetor (basically a giant vacuum pump) has been replaced by a precise system of fuel injectors that directly mix air and fuel into the cylinders.  This minimizes the loss of fuel from evaporation.  The injectors only release fuel at the proper point in the cycle making sure all the gas that's released is properly burned.

A central computer controls the flow of air and fuel through the fuel pump and injectors.  It constantly monitors the efficiency of the combustion system through the oxygen sensor, adjusting the mixture depending on the air pressure and temperature.

A classic car (one built before the fuel injection was commonplace) burns fuel in a more brute force manor: fuel is pumped through the carburetor at a standard rate and based on a one-time tuning the mixture is burned at a constant rate based on the position of the throttle (i.e. your foot).  Since there's no adjustment based on environment and conditions the rate of fuel consumption is much higher than a modern engine managed by a computer.  Factor in that most classic cars are over 30 years old and have significant wear makes the situation even worse.  The typical carburetor-based muscle car makes less than 10 miles per gallon.

And the situation continues to get worse when you consider these cars are designed to run  lead-based fuel.  The lead in the gas was used to lubricate valves and since modern gas doesn't have lead an additive is typically used.  This lead-additive is toxic and potentially hazardous.  Many old cars have some kind of minor fluid leak releasing these chemicals into the environment.  Even in minute amounts lead is a problem.

So, with so many strikes against them it's not surprising that some people in the legislature are actively looking for a way to restrict their use.  A tax on title or plate registration is a way to make driving these cars less attractive.  By charging a "usage fee" basically, on these high emission low-fuel-efficient vehicles you can essentially reduce their presence on the road.

Personally I think this is the wrong approach.  Owners of most classic cars (cars over 25 years old officially) are more careful and attentive to their vehicles than the average car owner.  These cars receive more love and care than the statistics can claim.  The average age of owners of these cars is 20 years higher than the national average and therefore more responsible.

It's true that these cars create more emissions and are less fuel efficient, but another important consideration is that these vehicles are also driven less frequently than the average daily driver.  Many classic car owners only drive their cars less than 3,000 miles a year, and then only in fair weather and in the summer months.  Classic car insurance policies restrict the drivable mileage for these vehicles already as a means of reducing premium amounts.

So while these cars do contribute to the fuel shortage and greenhouse gas effect their numbers are limited and controlled already to a point that they are of little threat.  Eventually the definition of classic car will shift as newer computer controlled cars move into the definition of classic or collector car.  More and more of the older muscle cars will slip into retirement, bringing the average MPG for this class of car up substantially.

There's no need for special taxes or other draconian methods to control classic and antique cars; the industry already controls them adequately through other means.
Trackback(0)
Comments (8)add
Banning might be a good thing, Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by sannymae , June 23, 2008
This is silly, classic cars are not the problem. SUVs are the problem... smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
...
written by anymouse , June 23, 2008
I don't think we need to worry about it. People won't drive their old cars during the ice age. smilies/kiss.gif
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -5
How much do you drive your "classic"
written by sqrlking , June 23, 2008
I think the low mileage most of us "classic" car owners put on our cars should be a huge consideration, and even key when considering this sort of legislation. Personally, I drive my '65 elky every day... but I have a commute of less than 2 miles, which, with driving home for lunch, equals out to about a gallon a day on my worn 283 & 4 speed. If i had anything more than about 10 miles to drive in a day, I'd find more economical transportation. The market demands it.

Also, and I know this isn't very cool of me to say,there are starting to be alternatives to the classic ICE. While I enjoy working on or building up old small blocks, I think an inexpensive opportunity to convert to electric or hybrid would lure me fairly quickly. A chance to work on my car, and do something most people haven't? Where do I sign up?
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +9
V.P.
written by Charlie , June 24, 2008
Be realistic, it's not the classic cars or the SUV, it's our politicians that have invested in oil and they are getting richer by the minute as the price of oil goes up and up. We need to look strongly at who we put into office and hold them accouintable for their actions and quit whining and do something about it. The local, state and federal governments don't seem to be as nearly conserned about as we are. I don't see them cutting back. Just check who and how many of the afore mentioned departments have personel that drive government vehicles home and are allowed to drive them w/ their familys out to supper, to grocery store ect. In my home town the impound yard/ blood hound handler drive a Chevrolet 2500HD crew cab w/ a push bar and a winch and he allowed to drive it anywhere he goes. I have seen him numerous time out to supper w/ his entire family in the county's truck. All police, state toopers cars never shut off they let them idle for hours on end for some apparent reason. How much would fuel would that save just by cutting off the cars when they are needed? I guess I have complained enough, but getting rid of the classic cars to save gas ....COME ON, WAKE UP GUYS!
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +4
Banning classics is well.. a joke
written by Scott , July 02, 2008
Hello,

When people talk about banning classic cars, well it get's me a tad excited. I have two classics. A 68 Mustang and a 73 Monte Carlo. The Mustang was my brother's who died in '93 and has become an airloom. the Monte is my passion. I live in Oxford, pa and just got back from Cincinatti. We traveled out there because of a car show. My car is carburated, however, I installed a 4 speed transmission a few year back. I was amazed that I got 17 mile per gallon on this trip. I know that is not a Prius's mileage, however, it competes with a large SUV of TODAY's standards. Hot Rodders are about preserving the history of these vehicles and the American culture. In 5 years, I've put less than 20,000 miles on this car, and feel that is a lot of miles. I've taken it to Nashiville, Cincinatti twice and plan on going to St. Louis in it next year. People who think taking these cars off the road are not dealing with reality. I'm paying 4.00 a gallon to drive it long distance, that is my insanity smilies/smiley.gif. It's a love and and hobby. Whether it's my 73 Monte or your Escalade, it won't make a difference. The Escalade will be driven 12, 15, 20k a year. The price at the pump will kill the Escalade, the 73 Monte will be driven if gas is $10.00 a gallon. Maybe less, however, it's a hobby a road trip my 8 year old boy and I will never forget.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +2
...
written by brian , August 02, 2008
smilies/grin.gif Classic and antique auto's are not a fuel problem. They probably make up less than 1% of auto usage and are part time at most.Let's get real about new technology for daily drivers and aircraft and we'll have a start at the fuel problems. Politicians don't have anything to do with fuel prices we do,China, India,etc.We need new forms of fuels. Just remember that we don't ride horses and wagons any longer and now it's time for oil/gas replacements....Let's call it transportation evolution.I'll make my own fuel if I have to so that my classic stays alive as a piece of history
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
are all brain dead
written by Doug , October 20, 2008
Brain dead zombies...

THERE IS NO PROOF OF ANY MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING . THERE ISN'T EVEN ANY CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE WORLD ISN'T IN A NORMAL PATTERN OF COOLING AND WARMING.

DRIVE AS MUCH AS YOU WANT DRILL FOR MORE OIL AND STOP BELIEVING LEFT WING PROPAGANDA.


report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +3
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >